The CX-90’s eight inches of ground clearance provided a clear outlook on the road. The proportions with a shorter front overhang and longer rear overhang give a visual of length, but not in an excessive way. The design proportions of the smooth body, meant to accentuate emotion, is without cladding and has tasteful chrome along the lower doors, rear and front lower fascia, roof rails and trimming the grille. The CX-90 exterior, employing the company’s Kodo: Soul of Motion design theme, is Mazda’s most refined crossover, starting with a more restrained grille and attractive LED front and rear lighting. The all-wheel drive system, with rear-wheel bias, is standard on all CX-90 models. This feature makes it possible, when there is a sufficient charge, to select the EV Mode button to efficiently drive in-town without using any gasoline.Īll engines use a drive-by-wire 8-speed automatic transmission with driver selectable drive modes. By pressing a center console button the battery will use the engine to charge up while driving. The CX-90 PHEV has a very handy and useful Charge Mode. There is no mystery about how to stay away from gasoline stations for much of your in-town driving. The CX-50 feels closer to name-brand entry-level luxury cars than any other small SUV.Even at the Level 1 charge rate, the battery will be topped-off by plugging it in overnight, just like you do every night with a mobile phone. However, Mazda’s well-appointed interior, standard all-wheel drive and premium design are worth it. The base 2.5 S checks in at $31,675 and the top Turbo Premium Plus is an eye-opening $45,125. Pricing for the CR-V starts at $30,795 - including the destination fee - for the base LX trim and rises to $40,795 for the top Sport Touring Hybrid. Honda does make use of hard plastics in the interior, though they are thankfully placed strategically - buyers won’t interact with these surfaces much. Honda’s reputation for solid build quality is bolstered by the CR-V. Honda does not offer ventilated front seats or heated rear seats in the CR-V. Thankfully, the cabin is otherwise quiet. Hard acceleration in the CR-V also feels more stressed than in the CX-50, and the Honda’s hybrid powertrain can be a little noisy. They will be felt, but the CR-V returns to its smooth ride quickly. The softer CR-V eats up most road imperfections. The hybrid CR-V is even more efficient at 37 mpg combined. Meanwhile, the base CR-V with all-wheel drive gets an EPA estimate of up to 30 mpg. The CX-50’s optional turbocharged engine is even lower at 25 mpg combined. In this configuration, the EPA estimates that it will get 27 mpg in combined city/highway driving, which is a bit below average for a small SUV. The Mazda CX-50 comes standard with a four-cylinder engine and all-wheel drive. Which one of these SUVs is the better buy? Edmunds compares them to find a winner. The Mazda CX-50 is a new competitor that boasts distinctive styling, a classy interior design, and a strong turbocharged engine option. It’s an intriguing choice and highly recommended by Edmunds’ experts. It’s also coming off a full 2023 redesign in which it received more rear legroom, an improved hybrid powertrain option, and updated technology features. The Honda CR-V has consistently been one of the most popular small crossover SUVs on sale in America.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |